This site would like to set some non-essential temporary cookies. Some cookies we use are essential to make our site work.
Others such as Google Analytics help us to improve the site or provide additional but non-essential features to you.
No behavioural or tracking cookies are used.
To change your consent settings, read about the cookies we set and your privacy, please see our Privacy Policy
Back to Contents
Volume: 12 Issue: 1
( 2012)
Keywords:
omnipharm
ltd
merial
high
court
justice
found
may
considered
obvious
try
necessarily
mean
patent
lacks
inventiveness.
high
court
Jurisdictions:
UK
PATENTS: In Omnipharm Ltd v Merial, the High Court of Justice found that what may be considered 'obvious to try' does not necessarily mean a patent lacks inventiveness.
Omnipharm Ltd v Merial
[2011] EWHC 3393 (Pat)
The High Court of Justice found that what may be considered 'obvious to try' does not necessarily mean a patent lacks inventiveness, a number of factors need to be considered to ascertain whether an invention involves the essential inventive step, such as in this instance whether the resulting activity is obvious or not.
You must be logged in and have an active full subscription to view full articles. Log in now
Comments
You must be logged in and have an active full subscription to view and post comments. Log in now
Social Media
